Archive for August, 2012


I don’t know how many times I heard or read the moral equivalence bunch, when they are confronted with the facts about radical Islamic terrorism, point their fingers and with righteous indignation say, “Well, what about the inquisition? What about the Klan? See, we’re just as bad!”
Aside from the obvious fact that civilization came to grips with those monsters long ago, the equivocation simply doesn’t work anyway. Here are some very interesting numbers, along with the related source material from The Religion Of Peace:

More people are killed by Islamists each year than in all 350 years of the Spanish Inquisition combined. ( source)

Thanks to: http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/want_to_compare_radical_islam_with_the_klan_or_the_inquisition_here_are_som/

Advertisements

“Many of the Inquisition’s policies came from Pope Innocent IV’s papal order of which stated that heretics, or people accused of heresy, should be forced to confess. This statement encouraged unjust imprisomnent. This policy continued for centuries, seizing property, torturing, and condemning to death thousands of people.”  p.749 My World History (Early Ages)

THIS SOUNDS LIKE SHARIA LAW TO ANYONE THAT KNOWS ANYTHING ABOUT IT.

The Theme for the Day is Sharia Law. The textbook quote is about Sharia, and the Picture of the Day is used as an illustration to explain how the truth about Sharia Law is hided behind The Inquisition. Sharia Law and The Inquisition have similarities.

All posts are intended to focus around the theme for the day for that calendar date.

Taken From: http://creepingsharia.wordpress.com/2012/08/29/the-threat-of-sharia/

Imagine you were a teenage girl in Pakistan, and your parents married you off very young. The marriage is a disaster but you have no rights. You flee with your daughter to the U.S., you hide out for two years until the detective he hires finds you. In Pakistan, under the Islamic law there, the means of obtaining a divorce is only available to a man, but never of course to a woman. He demands full custody of your daughter. Oh, and he’s accused you of adultery.

You consider flying to Pakistan, to contest the divorce, but adultery is a crime under Islamic Law in Pakistan, a crime which is punishable by death. You will literally be arrested the moment you de-board the plane, in Karachi. You could face prison time, or even be stoned to death. And in Pakistan, your testimony under Islamic law is worth only half that of a man’s. Then you remember, you’re in America now and you have rights.

So, you petition the American courts, filing for a real divorce.  But unfortunately, your husband has a Pakistani judge as an expert witness who he flies in to testify in the Maryland court – and the judge accepts his view of Shariah’s “best interests of the child” as the same as Maryland’s “best interests of the child. You and your daughter are simply outgunned.

And to your surprise, you find out that the American courts have been convinced to bow to Islamic Law (the Sharia), and you are now without any money, you have lost your home, and you have even lost your daughter.

Does this sound just too crazy to be true – like something that just could not happen in America?  In fact, this kind of reckless disregard for American law, in American courts, is actually more common than one might think.  This scenario resembles what happened to one woman in Maryland, and it’s happening all over the country.

In the case of Joohi Hosain of Maryland, the court shockingly abandoned American standards, in making their ruling.  The court ruling stated that the best interests of the child should be determined not by American law, but by applying Pakistani customs and an adherence to Islamic standards.

But sadly, the story gets even worse.  The radical Islamist website, ShariaInAmerica.com, is celebrating this and other cases like it, as victories for Sharia Law in America.  As part of a larger initiative to bring America more into alignment with Islamic Law, they rejoice over the court’s ruling, and provide resources for others who support the advancement of Political Islam in America, as to how they can prevail by imposing Sharia Law onto our American legal system.  And, it is working!

While the Left is bending over backwards, to appease radical Islamist interests, and much of the Right is too cowardly to take a stand, cases like these continue to grow.  The Center for Security Policy has identified at least 50 cases.  But the  Islamist site, ShariaInAmerica.com lists having over 72 victories for Sharia Law, and counting, and boasts that many have triumphed over our American law.

So, is it really true, that this spike in verifiable cases, where American law is eclipsed by Islamic law, is part of a larger and more sinister objective, on the part of Islamists?  Can we really go the way of Turkey, Lebanon, Bangladesh, Kosovo, Indonesia and so many other nations – nations who, over time, have fallen to Political Islam through the advancement of Sharia Law?  It goes without saying, of course, that every nation which has allowed the advancement of Sharia into its culture is a nation where citizens do not enjoy the human rights that we enjoy today, under the law, in America.

Men can marry and keep up to four wives at one time.[v] Men can divorce wives instantly; in such case she gets no maintenance.[vi]  The only way for a wife to get divorce is to convince the Sharia Court that will negotiate with the husband who often puts a monetary price for his approval. Without this, the woman cannot marry again.[ix]  After a divorce, The father gets boys when they are 9 and girls when they are 7 years old.  Kids belong to the father.[xiv] A Muslim man is allowed to beat his disobedient wife or wives.[xvi] A Muslim man is allowed to have four wives at any given time. He is also allowed to divorce the wife or wives instantly and marry other women.[xvii] The husband is not obliged to pay for his wife’s cosmetics, doctors fees, the purchase of medicine for her, and similar expenses.[xxx]  Women can visit mosques but must not wear perfume. [xli] Majority of women are in hell.[xliii]. If a woman abandons her husband’s bed for the night then the angels curse her until morning. [xlv] Prayer is annulled by a passing woman, dog and a monkey.[xlvi]  A woman is like a rib—that is why she has the crookedness.[xlviii] Nothing is more harmful to men than women.[xlix] A woman enters slavery of her husband in marriage.[xlvii] One can have sexual intercourse with a captive woman after she is clear of her period and/or delivery. If she has a husband then her marriage is abrogated after she becomes a captive.[lix]  People ruled by a woman will never be successful.[lxiv] Because of Eve women are unfaithful towards their husbands. [liii]

Just a few samples. For more go to: http://sharialaws.blogspot.com/2011/10/examples-of-sharia-law.html

“Under the Sharia, women and men had religious equality”  p.462 My World History (Early Ages)

NO MENTION OF THESE PARTS OF SHARIA LAW INQUISITION IN THE TEXTBOOK

Many hadith, including Sahih Bukhari give proof that Stoning as ordered and practiced by Mohammed, for example: Volume 2, Book 23, Number 413: Narrated ‘Abdullah bin ‘Umar: The Jew brought to the Prophet a man and a woman from amongst them who have committed (adultery) illegal sexual intercourse. He ordered both of them to be stoned (to death), near the place of offering the funeral prayers beside the mosque.”

Hadith No. 8.805: ‘A married man from the tribe of Bani Aslam who had committed illegal sexual intercourse and bore witnesses four times against himself was ordered by the Prophet to be stoned to death’. [This Hadith as narrated by Jabir bin Abdullah Al-Ansari].

Adultery is one of three justifications for killing a person, according to Muhammad.  Bukhari 83:37

Two people guilty of “illegal intercourse” are brought to Muhammad, who commands that they both be stoned.   Bukhari 6:60-79

A woman who became pregnant confesses to Muhammad that she is guilty of adultery.  Muhammad allows her to have the child, then has her stoned . A woman confesses adultery and is stoned to death on Muhammad’s order. Bukhari 17:4206 7 4209

STONING IS NOT IN THE VERSIONS QURAN. BUT DO NOT BE DECEIVED. THE HADITH BY BUKHARI IS CONSIDERED ISLAMIC LAW.

There was a verse in the original Quran narration that prescribed stoning adulterers, but it was left out of the compiling process in the years following Muhammad’s death.  Umar’s insistence on the stoning verse is recorded in other volumes that are also among the most reliable Hadith, including Sahih Bukhari 8:817:

References from: http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/Quran/001-adultery_punishment.htm

This is the teaching of Jesus. This is the practice of true Christianity.

“Then the scribes and Pharisees brought to Him a woman caught in adultery. And when they had set her in the midst, they said to Him, “Teacher, this woman was caught in adultery, in the very act. “Now Moses, in the law, commanded us that such should be stoned. But what do You say?” This they said, testing Him, that they might have something of which to accuse Him. But Jesus stooped down and wrote on the ground with His finger, as though He did not hear. So when they continued asking Him, He raised Himself up and said to them, “He who is without sin among you, let him throw a stone at her first.” And again He stooped down and wrote on the ground. Then those who heard it, being convicted by their conscience, went out one by one, beginning with the oldest even to the last. And Jesus was left alone, and the woman standing in the midst. When Jesus had raised Himself up and saw no one but the woman, He said to her, “Woman, where are those accusers of yours? Has no one condemned you?” She said, “No one, Lord.” And Jesus said to her, “Neither do I condemn you; go and sin no more.” (Bible, The Gospel of John 8:3-11).

A great deal of guilt has placed upon all Christians because of the Spanish Inquisition. No doubt The Inquisition was a horrible time in the “so-called” Christian Church, but it did not truthfully represent the teachings of the Bible or the words of Jesus. And yet, non-Christians will never let this chapter of Christian history die –especially Muslims apologists. This is an old trick. The hand is quicker then the eye. To prevent Christians and others from seeing the even greater persecution of both Muslims and non-Muslims under Sharia Law, The Christian Inquisition, time and time again, is used to distract the world from what has been done by Islam for 1400 years. Islam is Sharia Law, and Sharia Law is Islam. Sharia Law is what Muhammad said, put into practice. Sharia Law is what Muhammad did, put into practice. The Inquisition ended after 300 years, but the enforcement of Sharia Law has not. Does not stoning a woman alive for adultery trump anything ever done by The Inquisition? When a women was caught in adultery, Jesus said, “He who is without sin cast the first stone.” Jesus forgave the women and she left alive. That is the practice of Christianity.

THE TEXTBOOK NEVER MENTIONS THE INQUISITION OF ISLAMIC SHARIA LAW BEGINNING WITH MUHAMMAD, AND CONTINUING TODAY.

“The hoods worn by the inquisitioners concealed their identities.” p.749 My World History (Early Ages)

Pictured next to this text is a person draped in dark robes. On an inner robe, on his chest is some type of symbol.  Covering his head is a tall, very tall, black cone shaped hood. The slits for the eyes are staring out into the eyes of the reader as if to say, “I am coming for you.” The chapter section teaches the student that The Inquisition is an example of what the Catholic Church did to Protestants between 1450 and 1750.

Disregarding the section text for a moment, the picture is designed to bring to mind any stored mental images the child may have of the Klu Klux Klan (KKK) in America. Turn the color of picture from black to white and the hooded man becomes a KKK member. Therefore, the conclusion is. Christians have always been evil KKK members. That is the impression intended. Subtle but powerful.

ABSENT FROM THE TEXTBOOK ARE ANY PICTURES OF MUSLIMS ENFORCING SHARIA LAW ON NON-MUSLIMS FOR 1400 YEARS. 1100 YEARS LONGER THAN THE INQUISITION.

Muhammad’s Child Wife

It is difficult to accept that the Prophet married Aisha when she was 6-years-old and consummated his marriage with her when she was 9. He was then, 54 years old.

Sahih Muslim Book 008, Number 3310:
‘A’isha (Allah be pleased with her) reported: Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him) married me when I was six years old, and I was admitted to his house when I was nine years old.
Sahih Bukhari Volume 7, Book 62, Number 64 Narrated ‘Aisha:
that the Prophet married her when she was six years old and he consummated his marriage when she was nine years old,and then she remained with him for nine years (i.e., till his death).
Sahih Bukhari Volume 7, Book 62, Number 65 Narrated ‘Aisha:
that the Prophet married her when she was six years old and he consummated his marriage when she was nine years old. Hisham said: I have been informed that ‘Aisha remained with the Prophet for nine years (i.e. till his death).” what you know of the Quran (by heart)’

Sahih Bukhari Volume 7, Book 62, Number 88  Narrated ‘Ursa: The Prophet wrote the (marriage contract) with ‘Aisha while she was six years old and consummated his marriage with her while she was nine years old and she remained with him for nine years (i.e. till his death).

CHILD MARRIAGES STILL GO ON TODAY IN SHARIA ISLAMIC COUNTRIES